Deputy Who Killed Marine Identified
Sources say Darren Sandberg, a former Sheriff's Academy instructor, fired the shot that killed Sgt. Manny Loggins Jr. on Feb. 7 in San Clemente.
The sheriff's deputy who shot and killed Marine Sgt. Manny Loggins during a predawn traffic stop last week was Darren Sandberg, according to multiple law-enforcement sources who asked not to be identified.
Approached by Patch at his home Friday evening, Sandberg declined to comment, saying, "You'll have to take all that up with my department."
Orange County Sheriff's Department spokesman Jim Amormino also declined to comment, saying, "I don't know his [the shooter's] name." Amormino also said officials wanted to finish a "threat assessment" before deciding whether to release the deputy's identity to the media.
Privately, other sources named Sandberg, who worked as a deputy in Mission Viejo before joining the Sheriff's Academy in mid-2011 as an instructor. One source described Sandberg as "high-strung," and said some sort of "problem" led to his recent departure from the academy.
Sandberg has received praise and commendations in other quarters. Last June, shortly before he transferred from the sheriff's Mission Viejo station to the academy, city officials praised the deputy's service, according to minutes from the June 20 City Council meeting.
Mission Viejo Mayor Dave Leckness announced he would miss Sandberg, noting the deputy led scout and student tours at City Hall and "Darren’s participation is always the highlight of the kids’ tour," according to the minutes. Councilwoman Rhonda Reardon said she also would miss the deputy.
Earlier this week, the deputies' union issued a news release defending the shooting of Loggins as justified. Among other things, the union noted that the deputy in question, a 15-year veteran of the force, had been awarded two Sheriff's Department lifesaving medals and one Medal of Courage.
In 1996, Sandberg briefly resuscitated a 71-year-old heart attack victim he discovered while "returning home from training with another trainee," according to a Los Angeles Times story. Although Sandberg restored the man's pulse, the victim later died at the hospital, the paper said. Nevertheless, the deputy was given a lifesaving medal.
In 2007, then-Sheriff Mike Carona gave Sandberg another lifesaving medal after he and Deputy Kevin Geary saved a 52-year-old motorcycle accident victim they found bleeding in the street as they drove to work through Aliso Viejo. Sandberg helped perform CPR on the victim.
In 2005, Sandberg -- along with Deputy James E. Christian and Community Services Officer Marie A. Chasco -- received the department's medal of courage for actions taken during a traffic accident in which a driver was trapped in a burning car.
In contrast, the shooting of Sgt. Loggins has touched off considerable debate, with friends of the Marine describing Loggins as a deeply religious man who would never disobey authority or jeopardize the safety of his daughters, who were in the backseat of Loggins' GMC Yukon when he was shot.
The deputy's defenders say Loggins was acting irrationally and created the situation that led to his death.
On Feb. 9, two days after the shooting, Sandberg posted a comment on his Facebook page that said, "Thanks everyone for all your support. I am doing good. Love you."
The post was removed from public view late Friday afternoon, shortly after Patch began trying to confirm Sandberg's involvement in the shooting.
The Orange County District Attorney's office declined to comment for this story. The deputies' union referred Patch to the Sheriff's Department when asked to confirm Sandberg's name.
Paul Meyer, the lawyer representing the deputy who shot Loggins, didn't return calls to his office.
GreenInOC
9:41 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012
Wow - you guys are doing a great job reporting & keeping on top of this. Please continue on this path.
John Smith
11:14 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
This fatal shooting of a reportedly unarmed man, reportedly sitting in his car -- particularly in front of his kids -- stinks to high heaven. But isn't there some journalistic standard regarding the printing of a rumor by an anonymous source, i.e. that Sandberg was "high-strung" and left his previous job because of an unidentified "problem"? Sandberg is -- apparently deservedly based on the facts reported so far -- in a world of trouble right now. But should this open the door to any person who has a score to settle with him to enjoy anonymity while making highly prejudicial statements about him to reporters?
I question the ethics of the reporters in printing such unattributed rumor-mongering.
John Smith
11:16 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
"left his previous job" should read "left the academy"
Oracle
9:41 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012
Adam, your coverage of this tragedy has been better by far than any other media source, keep up the good work.
Chris McLaughlin
9:47 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012
Thanks for the scoop, Patch!! Another thing that I thought didn't quite add up in this story was that Sgt. Loggins seemed to be well known to take his daughters to the high school in the morning frequently, but the Deputy seemed to have no idea about this. I wondered if the Deputy was new to that shift or area, because if that was his usual spot to catch up on reports and look out for speeders or whatever, you'd think he wouldn't have acted so extreme when the Yukon drove through the gate, because he would have known the gate wasn't usually locked, and that some people go there at that early hour sometimes.
The info about being recenty transferred from the Academy is sure to get a lot of scrutiny...
Vern Smoot
4:41 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
This whole thing stinks. How many times has the story changed? And was this cop really doing reports or sleeping? Don't they have to call in and report they're stopping to do reports. This department is stonewalling. The spokesman doesn't even know the identity of the cop? Come on! Is Mr. Loggins considered a federal employee? If so, the Feds should take over this investigation post haste!
Dmo
9:55 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012
Wow this is why I lost a great friend. Family man and devout christian person to someone who shouldn't been identified as an officer
The Peacekeeper
9:56 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012
This deputy looks like he needs to mix in a salad and treadmill! An unfortunate case, nonetheless.
Chris McLaughlin
10:19 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012
Kind of eerie quotes at the end of this 2010 story, I think, given the present incident.
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/sandberg-242339-child-car.html
James Schumaker
10:51 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
"Be a good parent," Sandberg said. "Take your kid with you." You're right, it's eerie.
GreenInOC
10:31 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012
"...Jim Amormino also declined to comment, saying, "I don't know his [the shooter's] name."
If this is true there are two options as I see it, either it's true and Amormino is grossly incompetent or it's a lie his representation of the OCSD is egregious beyond comprehension.
peoplewatcher
10:47 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Green, I totally agree. I would much rather have a spokesman tell us that he doesn't want to or isn't allowed to release the shooter's name than have him put forth such a ridiculous statement.
Mr Salty
7:24 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
High Strung is another way of saying Nervous Nelly. "Problem" ? No doubt.
And a citation from filth tainted Carona for actually performing like a human being.
What a tragedy this whole story is.
My heart breaks for Manny's girls.
Mr Salty
7:29 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
I just reread this article.. If the "Law Enforcment" sources gave his name and don't want to be identified it may be a chink in the armor.
He may actually have to pay for his horrible judgement.
Oh how I long for the days of Peace Officer.
JUNGLEDOG1969
7:47 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
THIS SOUNDS STRANGE TO ME. A MARINE NCO WITH A GREAT REPUTATION VS. HIGH STRUNG COP....MUST BE MORE TO THIS STORY...GREAT JOB COVERING THIS AS THINGS DEVELOPE....
Ronald Douglas Kennedy
8:45 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Is the developing police state, now going to lose one of it's finest? FLUSH
James
8:52 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
find it funny how everyone was commenting about the cops are fat and bald, then what do they show pic of? A fat and bald cop. Yeah he hasnt been in Marines for a while.
Dr. Zillman
8:57 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
It will be interesting to say the least, to hear the OCSD's explanation of why they had to kill Manny. Was he threatening his children with a firearm? Was he strangling one of them? There are plenty of times when deadly force is absolutely required in situations. But the frequency of officer involved shootings where the "suspect" is killed appear to be more and more frequent; many of these incidents make you scratch your head any say "why did they use 2 entire magazines of ammunition to do it?" And to make matters even worse, once information trickles out it appears as though the institutions that represent the LEO twist and cover-up facts that sully their cases.
1. The Kelly Thomas incident. Classic case of a corrupt police department with no leadership.
2. The Douglas Zerby shooting in Long Beach. http://belmontshore.patch.com/articles/police-chief-autopsy-shows-doug-zerbys-arms-outstretched-when-officers-fatally-shot-him-2
CriticalThinkerInFV
9:10 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Lmao. Everybody jump jump the gun. If Sandburg was the one killed in the same situtation you all would be writing about how a life saver and medal of courage winner was taken too early. High strung cop.... Lol, I know several officers and most of them can be considered "high strung." All I am saying is that people should at least wait for more information prior to formulating judgments about this officer.
Dr. Zillman
9:43 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
"Jumping the gun?" Just pointing out observations.
Diane Hennessy
9:16 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Great reporting Patch guys! You're the only place we get current and correct information!
SouthOCBrian
9:59 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
I have watched the Orange County Sheriff's Dept. violate civil rights for YEARS in South County. (Especially the high school kids' civil rights--for years they have been stopping them, detaining them and searching them with COMPLETE disregard for the 4th Amendment and its protection from illegal searches and seizures.) I have feared that their renegade "above the law" practices would one day come to someone being killed by their brazen disregard for (and out of touch with) situations where no crime is being committed, but they are required to use critical thinking. Fact is, the OC Sheriff's Dept. is a problem due to (generally) being out of touch with society due to its xenophobic and megalomaniac tendencies--it is fatally flawed because, inter alia, they make these guys work the jail in Santa Ana for years before they see any patrol duty. By the time they hit the street they have been cussed at (called things you wouldn't call your worst enemy), spit on, and physically threatened. They are, unfortunately, conditioned to believe that EVERYONE is a criminal. And, FYI, I am a property tax paying homeowner in S County who counts many friends in law enforcement. BUT, most don't respect the Orange County Sheriff's officers because of the way they drive around in S County like the Gestapo trying to intimidate tax payers whose tax dollars PAY THEIR SALARIES. Okay, I have said enough. I have held my tongue for years, but could no longer be silent given this tragedy.
peoplewatcher
10:56 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
If you don't have someone you know and respect who has been in the Santa Ana jail or have never been in the Santa Ana jail then I could see how you might think that the deputies that work there get jaded because of the abusive treatment they receive. However in jail the abusive treatment is a total one way street. An inmate will get a beat down for even addressing a deputy I can't even imagine what would happen to a inmate that spits on a deputy.
EN
10:32 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Being a Marine wife of 20 years, this hit close to home. Fortunate for us the Marine Corps brought us here, and we love it. My kids both attend the HS. These stories frighten me, to say the least. Do I have to worry about these officers stopping me, shooting me, my kids? Illegally searching my daughter? This is extremely sad, that we must live in fear of the authorities that are payed to protect us.
I didn't formally know this Marine, but I have ran into him several times. He appeared friendly and respectful, I must say he has beautiful daughters! I am heartbroken that his girls no longer have a loving father, heartbroken that the new baby will never know his/her dad, that his wife must now raise 4 kids alone, because of an officer who made the quick decision to take this mans life.
I will never look at these officers the same.
Adam Townsend
10:49 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Kim Edds, a former Orange County Register colleague and spokeswoman for the Association of Orange County Deputy Sheriffs, wanted me to elaborate on the statement in the article about the union declining to comment.
When asked to confirm that Deputy Sandberg was the man who shot Loggins, Edds referred questions to the Orange County Sheriff's Department. The union already made statements concerning the Loggins shooting: http://sanclemente.patch.com/articles/deputies-union-defends-marine-shooting
Douglas Martin
11:01 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Great reporting guys!!
Interesting (actually, disturbing) that neither the OCRegister nor LATimes have reported this.
Also - How can Amormino state that he does not know the deputy's name? It is stated in the OCSD Blotter that the PIO was summoned to the scene at 0525:
[02/07/2012 05:25:33 : pos16 : MCFADDENGC] PIO WILLBE ENR
Amormino IS the PIO. Why would he lie???
Adam Townsend
12:01 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
I can't speculate as to the policy in the Orange County Sheriff's Department, but I've worked with Jim Amormino for years and he's always been straightforward with us. Oftentimes management in organizations purposefully, with the consent of the PR man, will hold back information from their spokesman they don't want released. As I said, I can't say that's the way the OCSD operates, but I always take Jim at his word and will continue to do so. When he can't give us information, we just have to verify it in other ways.
Douglas Martin
2:46 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Mr. Townsend, I have also always had complete respect for Jim Amormino. That's why his backpedaling and choice of words is so disconcerting.
CriticalThinkerInFV
12:28 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Im not afraid of the OCSD because I will not go to a HS and crash through a gate with my daughters in the car and not follow orders from a officer of the law. Law enforcement violates 4A rights on a regular basis around the nation not just OC.
David miller
12:39 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Roy, Adam: Thank you for the good reporting. Keep up. OC Register has minimal info. Keep up the good work of informing public of police/sheriff abuse of power
Adam Townsend
1:09 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Thanks David and all the commenters who have complimented our work. We appreciate the positive feedback and will continue to follow this story aggressively.
darnoc
1:50 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Stan. WTF. Just because the man did not allegedly follow commands does not give the offficer the right to use deadly force. Irrational ? Call for back up. This whole thing stinks to high heaven. LEO need to keep these weapons for only LIFE THREATS against themselves. You start playing the what if card and you have become judge and jury. Stan. Do you think the fact he was black had anything to do with it ? Do you think the fact the Deputy was considered "High Strung" might have anything to do with this case. You dont shoot a man in his car with his daughters in it. NEVER. 3 Rounds ? I say about 5 Million this one will cost the taxpayers.
dave
1:56 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
He committed suicide by cop? Did he say that?
Stan..go back in your cave, start reading and become educated.
Until then s.t.f.u.
Ryan N
2:30 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Being a cop is no easy task. And you all get the luxury to sit back and scrutinize the actions taken without any real evidence. Let the DA do it's job and investigate.
dave
2:46 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Right....we should all have never expressed any sense of concern when
an unarmed man who has committed no crime is shot to death in front
of his daughters, We should be shopping and watching TV. Bad stuff
happens. The authorities always know what to do. Why get involved?
Chris McLaughlin
6:17 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Ryan, I also hate it how lawyers get to sit back in a nice, well-lit, air-conditioned courtroom and pick apart your actions in the field as if you've got infinite time and information to consider, instead of reality (fatigue, danger, incomplete info, dynamic circumstances) but that just makes the case even better that clear protocols need be established, implemented, and consistent throughout training.
Having said that, the actions/protocol/outcome any citizen can question, even without seeing all the evidence, is the scenario/combination of factors no one is denying at this point:
1) Unarmed suspect with his kids present.
2) Suspect not attacking/assaulting the Police or anyone else.
3) Shooting a suspect through the driver's side window, with intent to kill, without exhausting non-lethal means first.
3a) In order to protect others in the vehicle (!).
Those are the undisputed details, and #3 is the action that most people disagree with, given #1 and #2 (especially considering #3a as the justification), and it's probably just the part of not trying non-lethal means first. I mean, if this scenario had played out a little longer, with Sgt. Loggins driving off, and then refusing to pull over, or had rammed through some barricades, or had gotten tased and kept fighting back, that would be different. Just shooting him down without trying anything else before going right to the gun and blasting away, I have every right to question that, because no one is denying it.
dave
2:35 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Without trying to be gruesome or insensitive the family, I think that the coroners report release may shed some light on the tragedy.
I was also wondering if a killing would have happened if Sgt. Loggins was.......
1) A woman
2) Much older
3) Much younger
4) You know what
Chris McLaughlin
5:51 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
I'd like to know when they started locking that gate, and whether there were any specific threats to the school that weren't communicated to the public, but caused Sandberg to be stationed there that night/morning (and be extra suspicious of anyone treading on the school property then). It doesn't add up at all that Sgt. Loggins was known to go there, and that Sandberg was present to initiate the response without anyone having to call the Police. The combination of the gate being locked, which was out of the norm, and Sandberg being there, which also appears out of the norm, is what made this tragedy possible. If either of those two conditions hadn't unfortunately coincided, than none of this would have happened, or at least the gate being crashed would have been the extent of the incident.
CriticalThinkerInFV
3:05 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Read the law and become educated Dave. Smashing through a locked HS gate with your children in the car violates many laws. I wonder what would have happened if Loggins was in Sandburgs place with the same training and protocol of the department. Also, when you tell someone to stfu you lose all credibility and your "expressed concern" goes down the drain. Goodluck.
dave
3:42 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Criticism over the "s.t.f.u." comment accepted. That was uncalled for and I apologize. I take nothing else back. To suggest that this killing was a "suicide by cop" is ridiculous. The term "suicide by cop" is reserved to incidents where distraught, gun or other weapon toting individuals purposely provoke law enforcement and ENTICE them to be shot, usually by pointing a gun at them. In those cases, the officers are within their rights to protect themselves. To suggest that a Marine father with excellent credentials purposely provoked tge OCSD to kill him is patently absurd. What is at stake here is whether shooting and killing a citizen of this country as a response to uttering "s.t.f.u." type statements ...if that is what really happened......is legal. I think it not. I have not seen a statement from Sgt. Loggins wife commending the officer for preventing the horrible consequences that OCSD said might happen to her daughters if Sgt. Loggins continued on his way.
Bo Bo
8:16 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
I see no damage to the car in blow ups. What crash thru a gate? If you can see ANY damage show me the picture..
GreenInOC
8:52 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
@Bo Bo - there appears to be some, minor in my opinion, damage to the Yukon. You can see it in this video, pause it at 16 & 17 seconds:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vty-vMYvskI&feature=related
Also, I wish that somehow the "crashing through a gate" line could be corrected to reflect reality. It's a hollow swing arm barrier. It doesn't take much to "crash" through it.
Bo Bo
9:45 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Green,
Thanks. Like I said it could of been from pushing the bar open but not crashing through a gate.
The film also says he was chased down and stopped.for a traffic violation.
What was the violation.
GreenInOC
9:51 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
@Bo Bo, they later "corrected" the statement from he was being pursued for a traffic violation to the Deputy was parked in an adjacent lot writing reports.
Bo Bo
10:30 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Green
So the deputy giving the interview just winged it? Made up the incident?
How can that be?????
And the people on this site expect a through investigation? lol lol
GreenInOC
10:36 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
@Bo Bo, that's not just any Deputy giving the interview, that is the OCSD Public Information Officer, Jim Amormino.
From the 02/10/12 Patch report:
"Amormino acknowledged that this version of events differs from an earlier account released by the Sheriff's Department, in which the deputy reportedly opened fire because he feared for his own life."
http://sanclemente.patch.com/articles/deputy-who-shot-marine-says-loggins-was-irrational-and-children-were-endangered
Rev. Robert Willard
3:22 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
I have lived in California for almost 55 years ( 0ver 30 of those years in Northern California ) Living in So. California, I have noticed that there seems to be a LOT of
" Gun Happy " police officers here, from LA to San Diego. They should change the name of Los Angeles to Dodge City ! ( remember the show " Gun Smoke " ) Most of the cities here have contract police from the County Sheriffs Departments. I have noticed on TV, the web and newspapers, that there seems to be a lot of these type of incidents where the officer has fired his weapon and asked questions later. This has got to STOP ! I feel that if more ciitizens spoke-up aout these types of incidents, there would be less of these type of " UNcalled-for actions " related to how the Sheriffs handle certain situations like this VERY recent,tragic incdent involving this verteran.
Wil +
Bo Bo
9:42 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
I agree reverend.... Where are the other reverends though?
Rev. Jessee Jackson, Reverend Al Sharpton, Reverand Wright?
If they want justice.... I mean publicly, they could help out here..
just sayin'
philip e. patrick
7:34 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012
ok, first he was fearing for his life, then he was fearing for the daughters, but the concerned officer shoots through a closed glass window, does anyone else think this stinks? Bullets fragments, careen off of stuff and can travel in unknown directions. Yeah that was way safer for the kids.
Bandini
3:45 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
The SC Police Services leaves much to be desired...and come across as uncaring and unprofessional...I have had 2 unfortunate interactions with SC Deputies, one for a BS no seatbelt ticket, where the Deputy ultimately admitted I was wearing my seatbelt, but not wearing it properly and I WAS wearing it properly...I beat the ticket in court...another where I was sited for failure to stop on the Pico offramp, where the green turn arrow turns to red instantly...both times the Deputies were rude and unprofessional. For Pete's sake, my mom was cited for not having a front license plate...she's from Arizona where a front plate is not required...and her tags are clearly AZ tags...Our three year old son is really disappointed the Deputies won't even wave back or acknowledge his greetings when he sees them...I mean come on, you're supposed to be a part of this community you police...then you read the articles about a Deputy beating up old men for driving golf carts on the side walk and now this shooting...it's an out of control department. I know we had our own force at one time, maybe it's time we look at reviving the old SCPD?
Bo Bo
8:20 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
What does Obama have to say about this?
Ryan N
3:59 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Law Enforcement has to make tough decisions every day they step out into this crazy world. Nothing is black and white on the street. There is never a perfect scenario when someone gets shot or hurt. Who cares if this Deputy is "High Strung"... Does that mean he's a cold blooded killer who purposely shot a father of two? Ummm no. Or do you think he premeditated killing a Marine based on some fantasy he had on pulling a trigger? I think not. Cops all over this nation want one thing: To go home after a shift to thier families. They don't look for people to kill, the people put themselves in the cop's path and force them to make a difficult decision. You people think you could do better job? strap on the gear, take the oath and stop complaining about something you'll never have the courage to change.
Chris McLaughlin
5:24 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Ryan, you sound like a cop. Do you think the Police are the only ones who want to come home to their families every day??
Sgt. Loggins took his family to the SCHS track in the morning because he thought it would be safe, safer than the similar facility on base, so he could come home to his family every day. Deputy Sandberg deprived them of that forever...
stevenson isaac
4:53 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012
the longer you are at a job the better you should get at it not worse, smashing into a lock school gate doesnot justify deadly force.you are right we dont need to complain we need action one man went home to his family and the other didnt
Bo Bo
8:23 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
If the deputy wants to wait to comment his thoughts on the execution then something is wrong. Your memory does not improve with time.
I learned that watching Judge Judy.
CriticalThinkerInFV
4:48 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Well said Ryan. Cops are proactive at times but this was a case of reactive policeing that went in a direction nobody would favor.
Chris McLaughlin
5:46 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
CriticalThinker, about favoring the outcome here, did you actually read the Police Union's statement?? They said what happened was favorable to allowing the suspect to get away and potentially do more harm, and I'm not putting words in their mouth, just read their publicized statement again. Gunning down an unarmed man in front of his kids is not the worst outcome in their minds. Allowing suspects to defy police authority is. Sgt. Loggins banked on the fact that he wouldn't get shot since he wasn't armed or attacking the cops, and he lost that gamble. I don't think he was medically incapacitated, or listening to headphones, or taking drugs or anything. I think he saw a cop with a gun drawn, he was probably really mad at himself for hitting the closed gate with his car, and he was just trying to get his kids out of harms way. He never imagined he would lose his life for defying police authority in a non-violent way.
I got news for the OCSD. Defying authority is a proud American tradition. It's basically what our Country is founded on, starting with the Signers of the Declaration.
What should be clear from what's happened here, and more importantly, different people's reactions, are that the OCSD still has some serious bad apples, and they are ill-equipped to get rid of them. I hail whoever dimed Sandberg out to the media, a clear break in protocol (read: defiance of authority). There may be reason for hope after all...
dave
4:49 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
We have the courage and the right to express points of view Your points are good and valid....but the OCSD and all other law enforcement departments can
always work to LEARN from these tragedies, and attempt to IMPROVE the training and discipline among officers regarding how to MINIMIZE the deaths of the citizens they are sworn to protect. If the actions in this case appear to be illegal, then prosecute the case.
George
5:06 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Thou shall not kill.
Why is anyone defending the killer?
clearly ... we have a lot of police officers responding.
George
5:15 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
I did not know that the police were allowed to discuss recent shooting/homicide incidents ... it's interesting that his friends on facebook were consoling him before it was released to the public.
dave
5:25 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Wonder what the story would be if the cop was black and the guy was white, was living on Lido Isle by Newport, driving a Mercedes and had HIS kids in the back.
George
5:57 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Get this straight POLICE... Don't you think we understand that you are monitoring us?
Are you so stupid to think we are not monitoring you?
We all have computers, we all have cameras on our phones, our technology is far beyond a dash cam. We can stream live. We can hold you accountable. We will NOT accept being killed for not following a verbal order. We will not accept your hostility and abuse.
YOU WILL BE EXPOSED.
ANONYMOUS
We do not forgive, we do not forget.
SouthOCBrian
6:37 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Bandini nailed it--his 3 yr old can't understand why the OC Sheriffs don't wave back or say, "hi". THIS is what I'm talking about. I pay their salaries; YOU pay their salaries--why do we accept the way they treat us (OR that the same TYPE A attitude might even result in them killing us?) I am a law abiding tax paying citizen with several good friends in law enforcement. I am NOT a cop hater OR just jumping on this bandwagon. Why is this feeling about the OC Sheriffs pervasive? MAYBE, just MAYBE, if these guys would spread a little good will (NOT be too "busy" or too proud to say hi to 3 yr olds, for example), more of us would stick up for them. This is a classic example of "you reap what you sew", and guess what the OCSD has been sewing for YEARS?
Terry Robinson
7:03 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Sure seems like a lot of knee-jerk reaction going on here....same as what the police officer is being accused of by the court of public opinion.
peoplewatcher
8:14 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Terry, Not quite the same
Chris McLaughlin
1:48 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Terry, it's just the court of public opinion, for only the segment of the public that follows Patch. It doesn't carry any legal weight. No one who's asked to be on a jury in this case would be empaneled by any decent lawyer after saying they've been following the story in the media at all.
Sandberg is being accused of way more than just a knee-jerk reaction. He's admitted to shooting a man dead in front of his kids, because he thought it was necessary to save the kids, without trying less-lethal means of force to achieve the same objective. He may very well have just made an honest, well-intentioned mistake, and may walk for it, but I think that particular set of circumstances should not be an 'honest mistake' anymore. It should be specifically not allowed, and the next time someone is about to do it, they should stop and not do it, or if they do follow through and execute an unarmed man in front of his kids, they should know that this is not covered and they're going to get the book thrown at them.
jsholdner
8:04 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Chris, not defending, but the gate might have been locked and the officer hypervigilant due to the bomb scare in September and the 80+ classroom door locks that were glued shut by vandals recently.
Chris McLaughlin
1:39 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Thanks J, that makes sense, that if someone was messing around at the school, possibly after-hours, then putting Sandberg near the school as a stakeout could have been what they were thinking, you know, to keep him out of trouble after getting asked to leave the Academy. What could wrong with locking the gate to the track and having Sandberg nearby in case the vandals came back...
Mike Proctor
8:05 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
I love the arm chair warriors, and keyboard jurors.
Ryan N
8:18 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Chris I don't know what sgt. Loggin was thinking at that moment so I'm going to try and assume. I also have no idea what the Deputy was thinking or feeling at that moment. This is a sad situation. Dave I completely agree that law enforcement can learn from every circumstance and situation. But the truth behind this situation and countless others, is that none of us will ever know it. The real truth lies with the law enforcers who have to live with it. Most of the time mistakes are not made with malicious intent. But you come here to throw stones when you probably haven't heard or seen any evidence. Why don't you wait until the investigation is over to cast judgment? The DA's office is responsible for handling all officer involved shootings so that agency's don't investigate themselves. And of course you will probably reply with a statement such as, "They ate just as bad as all other cops!" but before you do that; google how many investigations the DA's office has done on these types if incidents. They have a good reputation and a stellar record. Remember that the DA's office is one of the only offices to file charges of murder on a police officer acting under the color of authority (Fullerton).
Chris McLaughlin
1:32 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Ryan, Why am I not waiting until the official investigation is over to begin wildly speculating on all aspects of this case?? Because this incident is particularly egregious, and some unprecedented things have happened already, like Amormino saying he's 'explaining, not defending', and the CO of Pendleton publicly chastising the Police Union. The basic summary/headline of the case smells really bad, and just smells worse the more you find out about it: "Unarmed man gunned down by Police in front of his kids." (and that's without layering on the racial aspects, which probably don't apply much, but we don't really know yet. That'll have to wait until we see the video/audio, and whether Sandberg has a history of racial complaints)
I think this kind of case is exactly what the Founders/Framers were thinking when they passed the Bill of Rights. After Freedom of Religion, the First Amendment is all about questioning/not trusting your Government: Speech, Press, Assembly, Petition, it reads like a playbook of escalating your grievances towards The Man. The main reason why I'm not waiting, is basically trust, or lack thereof, which I think the Police Union's statement backs up. I mean, they blamed the victim for getting himself killed. They truly think we're suposed to believe that not obeying every verbal order from a cop is grounds for immediate execution. Since when is not obeying a cop a capital crime?? Murder 1 is a capital crime, not driving away from a cop!!
stevenson isaac
6:19 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012
Ryan i know you are cop let me tell a story about cops my little brother Dwayne Owen Isaac was a cop notice i said was in sept.2007 he was shoot in the head in the police station where he worked ST. John, U.S.V.I. they said he commited suicide, he would never do anything like that i know him he was a good cop people in the community like him. But its the nature for cop to cover each other mistake or bad behaviour like moving them from one department to the other but never really addressing the underlying problem .You say dont throw stone dont rush to judgement.what do think the Sheriff Union is doing when they say deputy Sandberg is justify in murdering an unarmed man they are sending the wrong message.We still have to be accountable for our actions and decisions no matter who we are. That is justice and the law of land.
George
9:00 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Thou shall not kill.
The man is deceased.... All these police keep commenting... Saying wait for the investigation.
The investigation does not matter you killed a man ... who had no weapon ....in front of his children . Period.
George
9:04 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
And we want to discuss what the district attorney's office and the sheriff's office has to say? are these not the same people who are employed by a sheriff who is currently incarcerated? I guess the union thinks it's okay to get a metal from a convicted felon, and consider it a commendation .
Chris McLaughlin
12:53 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
George, that doesn't really make sense, to say Sandberg's citations for Lifesaving or Courage are meaningless because they were awarded by Carona who's in jail now. I read about a few of them, and they seem pretty legitimate. One was for grabbing someone out of a burning car, when he was off-duty, and that sounds pretty hairy on the surface, so I wouldn't tarnish it because of who the Sheriff was at the time. If anything, hold it against Carona, for making maximum showmanship out of his Deputies' acts, and trying to take credit for it, but if you read the citation and it sounds legit, then it's legitimate.
Roy Rivenburg
10:21 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
The district attorney and sheriff are both elected by voters in Orange County.
Bo Bo
8:30 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Right on George.
The investigation should be over by now. What are we waiting for?
George
9:15 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Ryan n..... we googled how many incidents similar to this that the d a office has handled as you suggested .... why are there so many incidents? and how do you know about these amounts of incidences?
do you not see a problem? who do you work for? who are you defending?
Ryan N
9:20 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Do your homework George: nobody is or was employed by Carona, the county employed them. LOL especially not anyone working for the DA's office. Your ignorance is simply rediculous. And I don't remember Sandra Hutchens being incarcerated (current Sheriff if you needed a hint). Do us all a favor and spend some time on google before typing a response.
CriticalThinkerInFV
9:23 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
If Loggins was trying to get his kids out of harms way he would have simply complied after he violated the law by breaking the gate. "Favorable to allowing the suspect to get away and potentially DO MORE HARM." I am confident that the OCSD would have rather had Loggins comply then shot to death but they would rather have him dead then his kids or an officer hurt. This danger would have been real if Loggins had gained control of the vehicle again. Everybody keeps stating that Loggins was unarmed but do you know how fast a vehicle can be pointed at an individual and used as a weapon.
peoplewatcher
9:50 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Critical thinker, try living up to your moniker just a bit. Remove kids from the car, remove keys from the car, don't allow sgt. Loggin's to walk right past you and get in the car. It doesn't take that much critical thinking to figure out that these procedures all would have avoided the deputy having to fear for his life, I mean the children's life. Critical thinking might bring some doubt into assessing if any of the other statement's about sgt. Loggin's behavior are valid at all. Observed speeding while doing paperwork in a parking lot? Hit and run while still at the scene? Child endangerment how? Maybe think about changing your name or your position
Chris McLaughlin
12:36 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Of course the Police would rather have NOT shot him at all, but they seem to be fine with shooting him (without trying less lethal means of control) rather than 'risk' him driving off and doing more damage, which I think most reasonable law-abiding citizens are going to have a problem with, if it can't be demonstrated very easily that there was reason to believe he would go off and do more harm.
So it really comes down to what made the officer think that there was an overwhelming probability, not just a possibility but a near certitude, that he would have harmed himself or the kids (or come after an officer), and that blowing him away was the right call. I think it was probably that he kind of punked the Officer by not obeying him, even though he had his gun drwan, which must have flipped out Sandberg, because I bet that's probably always worked for him in the past.
The suspect didn't have a weapon, he wasn't showing force towards the officer, and he had driven into a gate going into the interior of the high school parking lot at 4:40 a.m. on a Tuesday with his kids in the car, like the access road going up to the football field, not the main entrance off of the main road. So, does that scenario sound like someone who's about to do some serious harm to his kids? Do many psychos go to the high school on a predawn weekday when they're going to flip out and do some serious crime? (I wouldn't think so. I would think that's what Ortega Highway's for.) So what was it???
Bo Bo
8:34 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
peoplewatcher
You hit the nail on the head with CriticalThinker... lol lol
He thinks you kill the guy because he may have broken through the gate.
Could be the gate was closed but not locked and he was nudging it open with his bumper.
CriticalThinkerInFV
9:25 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
?
George
9:30 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
And who do you work for?
So I guess everyone was fired from the sheriff's department ... when the convict sheriff was incarcerated? so you're saying that sandra hutchens doesn't have the ability to hire or fire anyone?
clearly you have no idea who we are ...we are anonymous
We do not forgive. We do not forget.
perhaps you should google us ?
Ryan N
9:49 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
I know who anonymous is george. The thing is, I just don't care. Your open ended threats behind a mask don't intimidate me or anyone else. I actually only see a mob of cowards, with a spineless catch phrase, "we do not forgive, we do not forget!" How absolutely brilliant. Don't get on here and start trying to bully your way around. You want to post your opinions then more power to the discussion. But you start throwing around your equivalent to gang signs,go someplace else.
George
5:45 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012
Maybe you should care. No bullying, just cold, hard data.... taken from your friends in L.A. Still don't care? Who do you think will be next?
http://anonops.blogspot.com/2012/02/massive-information-dump-by-anonymous.html
CriticalThinkerInFV
10:05 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Google anonymous, George is the first hit lol. You have no credibility George. Get your facts straight, write with coherency and maby people will take what you have to say with seriousness. FYI, I study criminology, am not a cop, and do not perticularly like police but this is no reason for me to publicly condemn an officer before an investigation.
CriticalThinkerInFV
10:52 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Im sure there was plenty of time to engauge the SUSPECT, evaluate the situtation, chase a fleeing suspect, take the keys out of the car, secure the children and take Loggins down with non lethal force before he got back to the car. NOT! Get realistic peoplewatcher.
Chris McLaughlin
12:14 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
I have to agree that the people who are hung up on the 'He should have never let him get back in the car!!' stuff are a little contradicting themselves. The whole thing is that he felt he had to use lethal force to stop him from driving off, all the while making verbal commands directing him to stop what he was doing. If that's the case, he can't just magically stop him from getting back in the car, unless, of course, he shoots him while opening the door and trying to get back in, which comes back around to the whole excessive force thing, so the people who are shouting 'He should have never let him get back in the car!!' haven't really thought that whole logical sequence through fully, in my opinion. (It does seem like a perfect scenario for a taser, though...)
Having said that, I remember former LAPD Chief Bill Bratton on the radio once saying that Police work in general is often 'physically stopping someone from continuing an action', which if you think about it makes a lot of sense, so the whole Cop-as-Thug stereotype is really unfair, because if Cops are often seen roughing someone up, or pinning them to the ground while they're trying to get away as they're cuffing them, or full-on tackling someone in pursuit, that's just their job:
http://youtu.be/KGERG5WoAY4
So while I absolutely support the Police's capability to possess and wield deadly force, they are absolutely required to use it only when necessary, and are responsible personally when they cross the line.
GreenInOC
9:38 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
"...people who are hung up on the 'He should have never let him get back in the car!!' stuff are a little contradicting themselves."
@Chris - how?
Sgt. Loggins was in a darkened part of the field and deputieS were back at the Yukon comforting the children. All the pictures show all but the drivers window up so I am guessing that the deputieS had one or both of the back passenger doors open.
How in the world was Sgt. Loggins able to start the car and put it in gear with deputieS at the vehicle?
Chris McLaughlin
11:03 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Hi Green, did you see you YouTube link?? How would you suggest that the Deputies have stopped Loggins from getting back in his car, especially since you weren't there and haven't seen the evidence yet?? One report said that Loggins snuck back to the car, or quickly appeared out of nowhere to get back in the Yukon. Until I see all the evidence, I'm not making assumptions about how easily it would have been to simply/magically prevent him from getting back in. They may have had to stop him physically. They may have had to tase him if he didn't go down easily, and they may have not had their taser on them, so that might not have been an immediate option.
I bet they pulled their guns because they had no other choice (in their mind), but deciding to fire instead of try something else first is all on them.
GreenInOC
11:17 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
@Chris, what YouTube link are you referring to - perhaps you could post it so there is no confusion.
From the Union's statement: "...Loggins unexpectedly and quickly returned to his Yukon."
Of course I wasn't there, nor were you I presume. It's entirely possible that Sgt. Loggins actions gave the deputieS no other choice but to shoot. However, with the "official" information being released being contradictory it leaves citizens, me at least, questioning what the "real" story is.
Chris McLaughlin
2:09 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Hi Green,
Look at this article on a full web browser and scroll up to the comment above this one with the YouTube link on it. It's of some idiot at a Red Sox game running out onto Right Field and getting drilled from the side by a security guard with no warning. It was just to demonstrate that when you say the deputies should have never let him get back in the Yukon, exactly what are you suggesting? That they should have shot him dead as he's walking back towards it?? I hope you're not suggesting that. Maybe tackling him was an option (like the Red Sox idiot linked above), or maybe there was a moment if he paused when he saw the cops and they could have tased him if they were ready to do that (before he got back in his SUV), but maybe none of that is realistic. For that kind of detail I'm waiting to see the dashboard cam, and see it correlated with the radio traffic to get a sense of where all the officers were actually at and if their story holds water about looking around the field for him as he snuck back to the Yukon unseen.
On his point, about why didn't the Officers stop him before he got back in the car, I have to say that may have not been an option, and it's annoying to see people think that police work is like a video game. In the real world, you can't just click on the suspect icon and press Pause, or drag and drop a potentially dangerous subject to the back of your squad car and have handcuffs magically appear on him.
GreenInOC
2:50 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
@Chris - If deputieS stood between Sgt. Loggins and his vehicle then he would not have been able to enter it. That may have resulted in the deputieS shooting him on his way back to his vehicle. This would make "more sense" to people as an explanation. If the deputieS were so concerned for his "screaming" children, they they would have removed them from harms way immediately. You know, since Sgt. Loggins was behaving so irrationally.
As it it and my point is, the OCSD official party line(s) make NO sense. I am not using any sort of video game prowess to deduce any opinion. The last video game I played was Tetris, long ago. I don't understand how shooting a man, who you and your fellow deputieS had the opportunity to prevent from getting to his vehicle, in his front seat, AFTER he turned on the vehicle and put in gear, is in any way protecting his children who are approximately 24" behind him.
People are questioning every action because, as described by the OSCD, then later described again to contradict their previous statement (lather, rinse, repeat), the story appears to be contrived.
Looking at some of the ariel shots, I fear the dash cam isn't going to reveal much as it would "seem" that the lense would have been pointed at the back end of the Yukon, which would have obstructed any decent view. I hope that I'm wrong.
Chris McLaughlin
8:11 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Hi Green, I like to speculate with the best of them, but I think there's probably enough real evidence that a real jury won't have the same questions you do as far as why the Deputies didn't stop Loggins from getting back in his Yukon. For me, it doesn't make the crucial difference as to the accountability for killing Loggins, because it's not like it was the final deciding factor or the last thing that happened before shooting him. It's definitely important, and possibly another breach in established protocol though that led to the violent conclusion.
CriticalThinkerInFV
10:54 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
Or change your name to outinspace, lol.
Damien
11:33 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012
For all you cop supporters - deadly force us not authorized unless lessor means are used first. SkippIng from verbal straight to deadly force IS NOT justified. Especially when the suspect has no deadly weapon. Excessive force is NOT permitted to stop a threat. Only what is needed can be used. I invite you to look up the CA statutes on this. Further the deputy has changed his
story in the reporting. There us no way unless the department is just blatant crooks is this deputy not a criminal at this point. Period end of story.
Ryan N
12:21 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Damien: the truth is that deadly force can be used if an officer feels his life of the life of another is in danger. The escalation of force is as follows: verbal, physical, non lethal, less lethal, lethal. Depending on the circumstance an officer may choose to use lethal immidiately. If a suspect exits a vehicle with a gun, should an officer pull out his taser! Lol. No obviously. The officer is going to use lethal force. If a female officer who is 5 foot 2 and weighs 100 pounds in confronted by a male 6 foot 4 and 230 pounds who is hopped up on PCP abd wants to fight, should she try to wrestle him to the ground? No! And Damien also stated that going from verbal to lethal is not justified but that's plain wrong as well. "drop the gun, drop the gun" bang. Damien, instead of inviting us too look up what you call "CA statutes" why don't you go ahead and school us please. I would love to see where this info came from. Just post it straight on here; let us all see this escalation of force CA statute. The only part of your post that makes any sense is, "excessive force is not permitted to stop a threat". BECAUSE EXCESSIVE FORCE is NEVER PERMITTED!
Chris McLaughlin
1:19 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
So it looks like he skipped physical, non-lethal, and less lethal? Or was he trying to shoot him in the shoulder or something and wasn't aiming for the head or chest?? (I know you weren't there, but from what's been released, it doesn't seem like those intermediate levels of force were attempted.)
The suspect didn't exit the vehicle with a gun. Sandberg isn't some diminutive female Officer, and not a rookie, either. The 'feels the life of another is in danger' part sounds awfully subjective. I bet that's why the Police Union is sticking with the Child Endangement angle. It sounds like there's unfortunately a little legal wiggle room in the protocol. I wish they would clarify that with a rule about: No Weapon + Not attacking anyone currently = escalate the use of force gradually and no jumping straight to execution in front of kids that in the car with him.
He should have tased him. He drove through a gate and wasn't completely cooperating. They should have tased him, ganged up on him and pinned him down and cuffed him, and we would never have heard about it. He was probably mad about having to pay for the gate/car, and under stress from about to have another baby and skipping a semester in school with the baby coming. We're still waiting to find out what Sandberg's issues were/are...
Bo Bo
8:42 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Turn in the mace. Turn in the baton. Turn in the taser.
Use the Glock .45!!!
Natalie Rolen
12:37 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
From LATimes March 21, 1997:
"Deputy Darren Sandberg, 25, of Mission Viejo was honored for her actions in an incident that occurred last year as he was returning home from training with another trainee and encountered a 71-year-old man who had suffered a heart attack. Although Sandberg was able to bring the man's pulse back, the man died at the hospital."
her?
Natalie Rolen
12:45 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
According to public records, Darren Sandberg was hired in 1994, that makes him 17 year (+9 months) veteran not 15 year veteran.
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/pay-214126-salaries-sheriff.html?data=1&appSession=46828521616644&RecordID=249&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=&cbCurrentRecordPosition=2#article-data
Douglas Martin
2:29 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
As far as Sanberg's "honors" for lifesaving - I've worked in emergency medicine, both prehospital and ER, for nearly 30 years. There are more people than I can remember who are alive today because I and my colleagues had the training and experience to provide life-saving treatment, many times at great risk to ourselves. Nobody ever gave us any "honors", and we never expected any; it is our job. Why does law enforcement think that performing CPR on a 71 year-old is so special, that they have ceremonies for the cop that did it? Arrogance...
Ms. Air Force
4:18 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Completey understand where you are coming from! wooooooooooooooow...
Douglas Martin
2:37 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Natelie Rolen - great find! I copy/pasted it here. $141,000.00/yr is absurd for a cop.
Name: Sandberg, Darren E
Title: Deputy Sheriff II
Agency: Orange County Sheriff-Coroner
Division: Mission Viejo Police Svc.
Hire date: 5/6/1994
2007 BASE
$82,776
PREMIUM
$4,475
OVERTIME
$54,207
TOTAL
$141,458
2006
$77,232
$4,918
$32,428
$114,578
Ms. Air Force
4:19 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Dang! I'm in the wrong business.. I had no idea that a cop in CA makes that much.. but since CA cost of living is so high, what is that equivalent to?
Bo Bo
8:45 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
To much overtime. He woke up from a dead sleep. Not filling reports.
Ryan N
3:53 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Chris, I'll respond tomorrow to your post. Natalie and Douglas, who cares about how old he is or what awards he has or even how much he makes? What the heck does that have to do with this situation? What is this, his roast? Stay on topic.
Chris McLaughlin
8:42 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Hi Ryan, I think the Deputy's background is very important to what happened here, as far as prior assignments, work performance history, whether he got kicked out of the Academy for telling students to skip the escalation and go right for the gun, etc. (Okay, that last one was probably pushing it, but not if it turns out it's true!)
What I think is less important is the victim's status of being a Marine, or father to the kids in the vehicle, or even medical condition/toxicology state, because the Deputy doesn't have access to that info on scene, so policy/protocol needs to be clear and generic. It is possible that the Deputy could have seen an EGA sticker on the back corner of the Yukon (if there was one), and that would have given the Deputy a clue Loggins was a Marine, or more reliably, the base sticker that was most probably on the windshield should really have told the Deputy not just that the owner was probably in the Service, but whether he was Enlisted or an Officer, and where he's stationed. It's those kind of details that allow you to identify who you're dealing with and establish communication, so if they missed that, then they weren't doing their job and should have known better that Loggins probably wasn't crazy. Plus the whole timing and location should be considered along with the overall picture/threat assessment. SCHS parking lot at 4:45 a.m. on a Tuesday? Is that some kind of high-crime area/probability??
CriticalThinkerInFV
4:29 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Blah blah blah, give it up Chris. Being an officer calls for you to make split second calls. Police shoot to kill not hurt arms, legs etc... Douglas, the awards are 90% bs and this cop is paid wayyy too much as most officers are.
Terry Robinson
7:42 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Me thinks that watchdogs have a VERY important and necessary place in our society. They work hard to keep suspects honest and accountable.....at least try to. In my opinion, the best chance watchdogs have at succeeding with their mission is to remain fair, dependable and reliable themselves and to not throw unnecessary fuel on an already volatile fire.....that helps nothing and no one. This quote by Gould comes to my mind....“The most erroneous stories are those we think we know best - and therefore never scrutinize or question.”
James
8:38 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Off Topic: Wow $141k, I didnt know law enforcement made so much money. I used to wonder why anyone would want to do that job, but now i see why. I would not say that over 50% of their time is pursuing criminals, depending on area of patrol. I know my brothers in Afghanistan have gone days no rest fighting and killing to really save their own lives for $35k if they are lucky; since most are young Lance Corporals and Corporals who don't get paid sh*t. The ones coming back missing both legs? Guess what they get $100k one time, this should help them for the rest of their lives? hopefully they invest it right, yeah they will get disability but thats not much; and these officers are getting 140k plus a year for potentially confronting danger. I dont remember last time i heard police officer getting blown up and missing legs. Marines come in weekly to Bethesda at least 2 a week, not because they didnt follow protocal but because they walked in the face of danger. Police Officers of California, I am jealous but kudos to you take it if you can get it. * Just a commercial to remind you to appreciate your local veterans*
Chris McLaughlin
7:45 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Good insight, James. Besides the total compensation, I was surprised at the amount/percentage of overtime. If that's rare, that's one thing for the Department, but probably significant for the individual here, as to why he was working so much overtime. If that's typical, it's like, what the heck?? Why wouldn't they hire more Officers/create some jobs and save The People some money?? Don't they know property tax revenue is down and unemployment is stubbornly high??
James
8:51 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Back on topic: I am starting to get exhausted reading the same stuff back and forth CriticalThinker saying the duputies were right for some reason with no real support of why it is justified besides they were scared. Scared and fear of your life or someone elses immediate danger of life are totally different; Ryan N Comparing the officer to a 100 lb girl vs a weaponed man, when that officer is FAR from 100 lbs and he wasnt alone"allegedly" and the vehicle wasnt pointed towards him or capable of being pointed towards him with where it was in that drive in. Then Chris McLaughlin having to rebuttal their comments with what seems to be common sense. I can't wait till this "investigation" does come to an end, unfortuanately it probably wont be for months.
orderup
10:27 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
At age 15 I showed up at a dance that I was not invited to. When asked, I left. A police officer told me to run. When just walking away, he fired, thnkfully in the air.
I have not trusted police since.
orderup
10:29 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
and I am now in my eighties.
Bo Bo
2:10 pm on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
order up
I got one also.
I got picked up for possession of stolen property. In the police station I was beaten by a detective until I confessed.
I tell my son if he ever does something illegal to wear a sweat shirt. Why? Because in jail it is cold. A t-shirt will not cut it. If you are wearing both they take the sweat shirt. 2nd thing I tell him is to keep his mouth shut. Call me or a lawyer.
That said I also work with the police undercover. Go figure!!!
Bo Bo
2:11 pm on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
I am in my 70's.........
GreenInOC
10:45 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Looks like Amormino decided it was suddenly important to find out the name of the deputy who shot a civilian after this story was published on the SC Patch (from the OC Register story published 02/18/12):
"Jim Amormino, spokesman for the Orange County Sheriff's Department, said Saturday that Sandberg has not returned to work since the Feb. 7 shooting."
Good to see, as the Public Information Officer, Amormino decided to take it upon himself to get some information and release it to the public. /sarcasm
Bo Bo
8:49 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
I would bet he is on paid leave. Where I worked we called it a vacation.
Loren Gapp
10:53 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
If the Marine did not have a deadly weapon in his hands at the time of the shooting. The law enforcement officer who shot and killed him should at least be charged and sentenced to Man Slaughter. Just becouse you have a badge
does not give you a right to kill.
It concerns me that California law enforcement
Have become so aggressive in their tactics that they have no regard or concern for any citizens or persons life,civil rights,or leagal and constitutional righrs.
I and my family will never again travel to spend time or money or vacation out of a port or in california ever again. When you witness law enforcement tackeling people for walking their dog in a supposed limited area or a kid face slammed becouse a cop swore he saw him smoking dope when the kid simply rolled his own cigarett
CALIFORNIAS FINEST FASCIST GISTOPO NAZI FORCE AT WORK TERIFYING THE PUBLIC
California is a prime example of big brother liberal and socilist government
POLCE
orderup
11:01 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
SC is a conservative area so more like facist conservative government
GreenInOC
11:04 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Interesting video from the law enforcement perspective regarding Officer Involved Shootings. Apparently produced by the Oregon DOJ and then posted on the OCSD blog on 01/04/12:
http://blog.ocsd.org/post/2012/01/04/Hollywood-vs-Reality-Officer-Involved-Shooting.aspx
Terry Robinson
11:07 am on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Really Loren.....me thinks the carjackers, rapists, child molesters, bank robbers,
home invasions, gang bangers, robbers, drug dealers, drunk drivers etc do a pretty good job of terrifying the public. We don't live in 1960's Mayberry
Loren Gapp
12:19 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Well as a liberal thinker you said alot when you said mayberry.
Barny fife was only given one bullet for a reason. Andy being a coservative was saving many peoples lives includeing Barny Fifes life.
The crime is bad and gangs are bad in califonia because of the way the government is run out there.
Janet Whitcomb
4:18 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Loren, both the content and style of your comments beg (if not positively scream) the following question: Where in the world were you educated?
LibertyandJustice
1:03 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
stop making comments here & start asking real questions to real people. Go after everyone involved, write letters, pritest the actions of this department. Bring the flame under their asses. The truth must come out. Justice wont be served here, but maybe if you get off your butt & actually do something, then this marine's family will have peace.
Chris McLaughlin
2:41 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Good point, LibertyandJustice. You could start with showing up at the San Clemente City Council meeting on Tuesday night, and giving City Council a piece of your mind. Apparently they're aware they're going to get sued over this (Item D in the Closed Session portion of the revised agenda: http://san-clemente.org/sc/Meetings/CityCouncil/Agendas/Download/613%2002-21-12%20REVISED%20AGENDA.pdf), and so you could press them for a public statement on the issue, or ask to start a working group to revise the contract the City has with OCSD, maybe to have the Police Union to pay for any lawsuits when one of their deputies executes an unarmed citizen on duty. That might motivate the Union to stop harboring thugs who commit horrific acts like this.
The meeting starts at 6 p.m., but I might be a little late getting there and I don't know if non-residents are allowed to make Public Comments, but our City's weekly City Council meeting is on Wednesday, and I'm going to get up and rip them a new one for not making any statement whatsoever on this issue. We also contract with OCSD, just like San Clemente, and have a former Police Chief and a former DA on our City Council, and they have nothing to say formally about this issue?? Not even a 'We're concerned about this tragedy and are watching the progress closely"?? Absolutely gut-less...
Riptide31
2:05 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
this officer is murderer hands down. If he was the one shot they would be forcing us to observe some vigil for him. He is an honorless killer and nothing more, yet some people feel he deserves a free pass like so many other cops that kill, beat down people, violate civil rights of others and break laws. Everyday in the news a cop is killing someone because he feels threatened or because the person wouldnt listen. What a joke...blow out a kneecap if you have to....there are many ways cops are trained to handle these situations and if they cant properly use that training and feel they have to unload a clip on someone not only are they piss poor cops....they are piss poor individuals
Ms. Air Force
4:13 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Read a comment that stated that the wife has been coaching the children so that the cop would look guilty! Really?! I urge the wife to hire her own medical examiner or even her own investigator, which she has every right to do, to get an unbiased investigation. This story has been emotionally draining and I only hope that Sandberg's conscience kicks end. But it doesn't look like it.
Ms. Air Force
4:16 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
The cops says.. That Sgt Loggins was acting "irrationally".. what does that mean exactly? The fact that I am speaking out about the actions of Deputy Sandberg could be determined as irrational.. So insane!
CriticalThinkerInFV
6:36 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
I can't wait James but I know you will say it was a cover up by the DA when they rule this shooting justified. That crappy orderup but a long time ago. Thank you Janet, stole my words. Riptide, officers are trained to shoot to kill. No kneecaps or arms.
Riptide31
8:34 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
Cops are also trained to detain and subdue. I understand sometimes killing becomes an option...but only after all other means are exhausted. Too many bad apples are holding too much power by having a badge and there are too many people protecting them. There are many great officers out there unfortunatly we dont hear about them. Taxpayers and citizens deserve better...justice should be for all not just a select few....crooked cops are of no service to society, as they would have you to believe.
Zimbabalouie
11:51 am on Monday, February 20, 2012
There is no question that this officer shot and killed an unarmed man. By their own official statements the OCSD has said that this officer was not threatened, either verbally or by any action of the victim. Further their official staements have changed details of the account several times. Couple these actions with the precise meaning of the words they have used in defining the officer's action and there is the appearence of an unjustifiable homicide.
That said allow me to take it just on step further. No use of lethal force should ever be automatically condoned by any employee of the people. The results of lethal force are extreme and can never be reversed. There is no "Do over", "whoops, my bad" or "sorry" that makes things better. Therefore every instance of lethal force must be scrutinized to the fullest by both the government and the public. The use of force should be used only as a last resort and even then with the knowledge that you are going to lose everything including your freedom if you aer found to have used poor judgement.
This is certainly not the case in America today. We are inundated with propaganda that cops are in a dangerous situation and they make split second decisions and they are always to be forgiven. Bull biscuits!
RONALD BAKER
2:08 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012
THOMAS
ZERBY
LOGGINS
THE ACTIONS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SHERRIFFS DEPARTMENT ARE OUTRAGEOUS. THEIR EXPLANATIONS DEFY ANY SIMBLANCE OF HUMANITY. IN THE EYES OF THE SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT THE MAN THEY KILL IS ALWAYS AT FAULT.
THE ACTIONS BY THE SHERRIFFS DEPT ARE
Jim
2:31 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012
As many times as the "official" story has changed, I'm not sure if I buy this gate-crashing bit that Sandberg claims.
Dr. Zillman
2:38 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012
Irrespective of all the speculation, one thing is certain: Deputy Darren Sandberg's life will never be the same after this OIS. He has to live with the fact he took a family's father's life in front of the father's daughters. That will be very, very difficult to live with the rest of Deputy Sandberg's life.
Chris McLaughlin
5:10 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012
Dr. Zillman, this may sound kind of cold, but I don't think Deputy Sandberg is feeling that bad, or if he is, he deserves every bit of it. The only time you should shoot to kill is if you're absolutely certain that it's the right thing to do, precisely so you can avoid feeling bad afterwards. I mean, if blowing away a suspect had to be done, then feel bad about the circumstances in society and things that happen to people to make them into the kinds of people that need to be cut down in the streets, but you should never feel bad about having to be the one to pull the trigger, IF it's the right action.
I think Deputy Sandberg should feel REAL BAD about killing an unarmed man in front of his kids, an upstanding Marine no less, a good Christian man, making his wife a widow and preventing his unborn child from ever meeting him, over a car accident gone horribly wrong.
Terry Robinson
9:20 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Point well taken Dr. Zillman.....and Chris, you seem to know Deputy Sandberg quite well. How he feels, what he thinks, what he should have done as opposed to what he did on that tragic morning. Are you friends....were you there? Why does the fact that Manny was a Marine make such a difference to you but not the fact that the Deputy too was a Marine? I just hope this investigation ends soon and the truth comes out so all this speculation is put to rest and if any measures need addressing, they will be.
Chris McLaughlin
11:01 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
No Terry, I've never met Deputy Sandberg or Sgt. Loggins, and I wasn't there. I am a double-award Marine Corps Pistol Expert, though, and a 9-mil Beretta pistol was my T/O weapon when I was serving with Marines. So I, too, have thought about what it would be like to shoot someone dead, and how you would deal with it emotionally afterwards, and Thank God have never had to go through that myself. I've also worked many an all-night shift in similar public safety-related situations (as an EMT, not a cop). Cops aren't the only ones who have to make many split-second decisions where lives depend on it, following strict protocols, based on incomplete information, and have to live with the consequences forever when they screw up.
So yes, I do think I know a little bit about how Deputy Sandberg must be feeling, and should have acted. You can't un-do shooting someone. You can't treat death. If you don't have the right personal mindset to carry the awesome power and responsibility of being able to legally take someone's life, then you shouldn't be carrying a gun, and probably shouldn't be wearing the badge.
Sgt. Loggins was a Marine for over ten years, up until two weeks ago when Deputy Sandberg killed him. Sandberg hasn't been a Marine for over ten years, and was supposedly only in for four. We haven't heard too much about his service record, whether he rates a CAR or what his MOS was, since he just got named last week, but I'm sure we'll hear all about it in court.
Terry Robinson
11:40 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Wow Chris....that's some pretty magical power you have there, to be able to see so well into the head of someone you've never met.....I wish I could do that. Are you able to do that with Sgt. Loggins as well?
Chris McLaughlin
1:17 pm on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Terry, You're not funny at all, and I wish Sgt Loggins were still alive to question regarding his state of mind and version of the events in question. He should only be cited for driving through the gate, and possibly arrested (and released) for failing to follow deputies instructions.
tuck
7:32 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012
Mom was "Right On"
JBS, "ultraconservative","far right","extremist"
Laguna Hills 1971-1989......
John Francis
11:13 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012
Why the hell did he shoot to kill? SHOOT TO KILL? EVERYONE who is reading this blog knows he was shot because he was black. OK, you drive through a locked gate, does that warrant shooting a man to death in front of his daughters? Its a disgrace, Sandberg should be sent to prison.
James
6:24 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012
"CriticalThinkerInFV
6:36 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012
I can't wait James but I know you will say it was a cover up by the DA when they rule this shooting justified."
CriticalThinker, if they come back and say it was justified, i would hope they make public their findings to their decision. As of right now I can not see anyway to justify taking someones life for a "possible threat" that he may have drove off and drove crazy causing harm to the kids. He doesnt even know for sure that he was going to, but because he was acting irrational"not listening to commmands" he can now read minds and knew Sgt Loggins was going to right? Like I said, hopefully the full report will show what they can't reveal right. Like what was Sgt Loggins "yelling irrationally" in the field? I want to believe that a police officer is going to make a poor decision like this appears, but i also see when they fully agree with officers shooting, they are quick to justify "the person put up a fight and reached for weapon" "person appeared to have weapon". This case? Nothing! So Criticalthinker if they come back with he was justified but we cant open the investigation? Yeah something will look fishy. But good luck with your decision of support. I hope I AM wrong, If i am wrong I am happy this officer did his job. If you are wrong you look like a freakin idiot with no common sense who just wanted to stir up friends, family and supporters emotions.
George
7:54 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012
Who do you think will be next???
http://anonops.blogspot.com/2012/02/massive-information-dump-by-anonymous.html
3328
10:17 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012
I, like many of you, was very disturbed to hear the news when it first came out. Ww have the right to believe and feel any which way we want and that will not change the facts. It is a sad tragedy. I've cried with those who have cried for the loss of a life and i've cried for the man who must now face the results of a quick, very possibly wrong action taken in a haste. Fellow citizens, judging so harshly based on the appearances will do no good to anybody. While a mistake might have been done hate will only create more hate. Are we looking for a society where peace officers will be against civilians and civilians against officers? We have the eyes of thousands of kids watching our reactions and listening to and reading our comments. What is the message we are sending? I want my kids to be law observing citizens and if any of them happens to be end up in law enforcement I want them to be respectful, loving and law abiding enforcers. The truth shall set us free and I sure do hope that in this case the truth and nothing but the truth will emerge and that justice will be served.
Terry Robinson
10:35 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012
Very meaningful....thank you.
Sarah de Crescenzo
12:10 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012
3328, thank you for posting such a thoughtful comment.
George
10:55 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012
With all do respect.... your comment "Are we looking for a society where peace officers will be against civilians and civilians against officers?"
This is the society we are dealing with RIGHT NOW! When a police officer shoots and kills an unarmed man in front of his children, it CLEARLY shows "officers against civilians".
3328
11:11 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012
Thanks for commenting George :) I do not see it that way. The way I've structured what I know of the case is it was a very, very costly and unfortunate mistake. We also have had corrupt civilians killing good cops and that doesn't make us all bad or "civilians against cops." We could get there though if we do not stop the hate cycle.
Terry Robinson
12:02 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012
I just cannot see how it CLEARLY shows anything, especially "officers against civilians". Something went very wrong here and we just don't know what, and at this point I cannot see that any of it was intentional on either side. Terrible yes....intentional, well to me that is one big stretch.
George
5:41 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012
So when a police officer gets shot, I will call it a terrible mistake.
That's Laughable!
I guess this gives us all the right to "make mistakes" against police. Glad to know.
I will tell the cop's family that "Something went very wrong here and we just don't know what" That should make them satisfied while they lay him to rest.
How does this make sense to you? I agree we should stop the hate cycle, let's begin with the police! They can start by firing all the officers that have ever worked under Corona, Hutchens needs to be policed herself... "if only we had more money and resources" is always HER BS answer.... So it's up to us... the community. It's our right to bear arms, and if approached by the police, I hope that there won't be another unfortunate "mistake".
Chris McLaughlin
1:00 am on Friday, February 24, 2012
George, that's really uncalled for. Cops know more than anyone about 2nd Amendment rights, and don't need to be reminded of them. If you fired all the Officers who worked under Carona, then we wouldn't have a County Police force left. Hutchens was specifically brought in from LA County to avoid the stain of corruption from Carona, and she's only been on the job for less than four years.
My feeling is that there's a long way to go for reform of OCSD, but I think it's only going to happen from within, and mostly from the top down, not from outside pressure. If you think about it, the only people who really know who the bad apples are, are other cops. The general public doesn't see behind the green curtain. Our only hope is that OCSD has the will to clean itself up, and I'm pretty sure the Sheriff is motivated to do that, so we need to support law enforcement in general, but be relentless when things like this happen and not let it go. I think the Police Union might be a major problem, too, it terms of resisting change, so maybe that needs serious reform as well. Their statement saying the victim brought it on himself is beyond the pale.
As for this case, it's been two weeks, and it feels like it's already starting to slow down. I would have expected an indictment by now. How long does it take to analyze a few pieces of video/audio, interview everyone, review the rules in place for excessive force, and make a decision?? Justice delayed is justice denied...
Bo Bo
9:28 am on Friday, February 24, 2012
Chris
Only been on the job for 4 yrs... When does the reform start? In 15 yrs.?
Kinda like Obama. Only been on the job for 3 1/2 yrs. When do we get jobs back and housing sold and the deficit reduced? 8 yrs.?
George has it right.
The investigation is over. Now we start with the political posturing & the fluff to free the accused police servant dedicated to protecting and serving the community..
James
2:32 am on Friday, February 24, 2012
Wi agree with Chris
Roy Rivenburg
7:04 am on Friday, February 24, 2012
Patch's latest story: Loggins Shooting Was Avoidable, Police Experts Say
http://patch.com/A-qX3G
Terry Robinson
6:05 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012
Proverbs 2:3-4
Cry out for insight, and ask for understanding. Search for them as you would for silver; seek them like hidden treasures.
Terry Robinson
7:28 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012
I need a definition of what is considered excessive force by police.
Bo Bo
8:59 am on Friday, March 16, 2012
Terry
To help u with a definition of "excessive force" I would refer you to the Wizard of Oz"
scarecrow where he sings, " If I ONLY HAD A BRAIN".
Start from there......
tuck
6:38 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012
Really is a sad situation. The memories I have with the O.C. Sheriff was back in the early 80's when they came to our house and arrested my 62yr old mom for not paying a leash law ticket that had turned into a warrant which she never knew about!. They actually took her to downtown Santa Ana and booked her! All you bozo's that keep on writing "let's wait and see" until this investigation is complete, WAKE UP!.
christine
9:35 pm on Saturday, April 7, 2012
I have to ask this, they go on about this officers credits, were any of these individuals black. I am fathomed by the fact that an officer is quick to shoot or beat a black man, and would never do the same to a man of another race, and they say racism is dead.