.
Feedback

Who Bought California, and Can We Get It Back?

California is in trouble, but not all is lost. We can help ourselves in November.

I like to watch the business/news show called Varney & Company. They combine a little political news and a breakdown of the market news that starts each day. Varney brings in knowledgeable people who understand both the market and investment ideas. Varney gives me a head start on the day. But one thing has been bothering me lately. Whenever they talk about the dire straits of the U.S. economy they end it with a comment something like, “If we keep on this course we will end up like the formerly Golden State of California. California is broke and failing to take steps to solve their issues.”

I guess we deserve it. We did elect Jerry Brown governor after having seen him make a mess of the state years ago. When you talk about the problem of Public
Employee Unions, you can thank then-Governor Jerry Brown for their current
power over the elections. There was also a discussion several years ago about what to do with an overflow of cash into the state during the dot-com spike in tax receipts. There was some talk about a onetime refund to the citizens, but it was
quickly disregarded and instead we spent it in such a way so as to increase the
base of the budget going forward. We in California are not new to this idea of letting the government run all over us. So, let’s face it, we have no one to blame
but ourselves for our current financial mess.

Good news. In the coming election we have an opportunity to start the process of regaining control over our state government. Proposition 32 would take power away from two of the major impact players who have contributed to the downturn of our once prosperous state. Prop 32 would place restrictions on both Corporations and Public Sector Unions ability to bring huge sums of cash to the political table.

Here are a couple interesting facts gleaned from the Yes on 32 website:

  • 79 percent of campaign donations come from donors outside the legislator’s district according to MapLight.org
  • $89 million dollars were contributed in the 2010 elections by Business Associations and Unions to the political process
  • More than $35 million was spent by corporate contributions
  • AT&T contributed to every state legislator
  • BSNF Rail spent $295,000 contributing to 75 percent of the legislators
  • PG&E spent $480,000 giving to 72 percent of the races in 2010 

When legislators are receiving that kind of money how much impact do you think you make with the $25 to $100 contribution most of us make? It may not be the contribution influencing the legislator, but the thought of all that money being used against them in a reelection campaign. If you are a successful politician you understand the difference money makes.

California is being bought and paid for by groups with interests which don’t necessarily match with its citizens.  Maybe there is a reason our schools have not been repaired. Have you wondered why the state would allow the utilities to put remote boxes on our homes so they could cut off the electricity or monitor when you are using the power you pay for? Why are private companies being allowed to build toll roads when we already pay gas taxes which were set up to pay for highways and improvements? Why, when we are next to an ocean are there water shortages in California? Seems to me that it does not make much difference if you are a Liberal or a Conservative; your personal needs are being rejected in favor of special interest needs.

In November, we are going to get a chance to start taking back the State.

How much difference would it make if citizens were the critical difference on who ran for office? What if citizens directed the choices of where our money would be spent? How much better would our state be if a legislator feared the citizens more than they feared the special interest people when deciding how to vote? All these things could happen if the legislators were held accountable by the people in their district. It is not too late for California.

My general rule is to always vote against any proposition since they are usually sponsored by a special interest group. In this case, I’m supporting Proposition 32 with the hope it will make a difference.

fact checker August 20, 2012 at 06:29 pm
Please explain how Prop 32 would limit corporate and individual donations to PACs. These corporations and individuals influence elections for their own individual (now that we all know that corporations are, indeed, people) benefit. Unions, on the other hand, represent the interests of many middle class people. How else would you suggest the middle class fight back against big money?
John B. Greet August 20, 2012 at 08:34 pm
"...now that we all know that corporations are, indeed, people"
Corporations are not people, nor has judicial notice ever been taken that they are. This lament from some is as tiresome as it is false. In fact, in "Citizens United" the Supreme Court took judicial notice of just the opposite, that corporations are distinct and different from people or, as the Court put it, "natural persons." I oppose Prop. 32 because I think two of the three things it seeks to prohibit should not be prohibited. I think corporations and unions *should* be able to contribute to state and local candidates and I think wage earners should be able to use payroll deductions to fund whatever lawful activities they like, political or otherwise. http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/California_Proposition_32,_the_%22Paycheck_Protection%22_Initiative_(2012)
Lawrence (Larry) McCook August 21, 2012 at 01:51 pm
It is truly sad that our State of California is running such deficit spending and the majority of our politicians will not "step up to the plate" and reduce spending. Standard and Poor has reduced California's credit rating which effects both credit and bond ratings. California is in critical financial condition as is our nation.
fact checker August 21, 2012 at 02:02 pm
What is truly sad is that the people of California (and our nation) have become so entrenched in the rhetoric of politicians that they won't listen to each other. Let go of the rhetoric and start listening folks. Your state is in danger because you have given it over to people who will do and say anything to advance an agenda that has little to do with what is best for the people of California or the nation.
Lawrence (Larry) McCook August 21, 2012 at 02:18 pm
Never better stated "fact checker"!
tinytom August 21, 2012 at 02:32 pm
Slow motion inevitable train wreck:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmXGVDnPU9o
fact checker August 21, 2012 at 02:34 pm
Your agreement is more ironic than you know.
V. Duvall August 21, 2012 at 11:14 pm
What is sad is that we DID elect Jerry Brown, again. Are there no "good" people out there that will run? Our choices are so lousy. Come on Party. Get someone that can defeat the dems. We need a good old republican that can get in there and fix things and stop giving my money away!!!
Larry Jackson August 23, 2012 at 03:03 pm
After a decade of chairing a legislative committee on behalf of California court administrators, I can personally testify to the futility of injecting any sanity into the legislative process in Sacramento. California is controlled by a duo that wields absolute power - the Trial Lawyers and the public sector labor unions. Together they present an insurmountable barrier against any efforts to implement tort reform or reform of the public employee benefit system, both of which, along with the economic situation, are draining treasuries and causing municipalities to consider filing for bankruptcy. I was personally aware of contract negotiations with SEIU where the union signed off on the terms of a labor contract with a local court, then turned around and killed the state law which would have enabled the contract's terms to go into effect. It appears that prohibitions against bad faith in collective bargaining is no constraint upon labor in this state. As Jesse Unruh once said, "Money is the mother's milk of politics." and all the money goes to whomever votes the party line on behalf of the trial lawyers and big labor. The taxpayers go to the back of the line.
John Webb August 23, 2012 at 06:18 pm
I understand the frustration with our State and our politics. It does come down to money, but it also comes down to people being fed up with the status quo. One of our problems is the problem is so huge, we are so intimidated by the political action groups, we don't stand up and face the issues. There is the ability for us to take back our state. We need good people, some will be liberal and some will be conservative. But all these good people will have to have a strong belief in Capitalism, Family, The U.S. Constitution and the American Way. We have to be willing to turn a deaf ear to those who would sway us from saving our state and our country. Once we identify these good people we have to get everybody to contribute both time and money. Many times in American History have we as a Country faced terrible times. We are lucky to be able to be part of saving this Country one more time. Stay tuned, stay informed and stay involved. Nothing is impossible for the American people. Another thought......this state is screwed up right now, but we have actual proof that the liberal thought process makes for good feelings and bad government. We have witnessed the fall of the Golden State and we now know what does not work. We will be better off for the experience. Now, lets get back to what does work.
fact checker August 23, 2012 at 06:52 pm
So your idea of working together is for everyone to agree with you?
John Webb August 23, 2012 at 08:28 pm
You disagree we should all work together to make sure our country remains one of the bright lights on earth? You disagree that only we the people can change things? Or, do you just disagree......
Ronc4109 August 24, 2012 at 02:03 pm
Unions do not represent the middle class, they represent themselves. The middle class is becoming the lower class because the activities of the public sector unions cause our taxes to be raised to support their bloodthirst for better pay, pensions and medical benefits for their own membership. Our taxes continue to increase, while the services that they are to provide continue to detiorate because the vast majority of funds go to these 'planned benefits'programs.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Rancho Santa Margarita Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Julie, Brady, and Brad McGirr Participating in the Flag Retiring Ceremony
Cheri Miller June 16, 2013 at 12:16 pm
This was our third year. I especially like being involved in the folding of the flags to beRead More retired. My daughter & I have always been the only ones from her troop to attend. Last year there were more Girl Scouts. I really wish the word was put out there more for them as well as the Boys.
Martin Henderson (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 01:43 am
For those interested, here (with pictures and video) are past reports of Flag Day.
Martin Henderson (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 01:45 am
Oops, I hit return before I wanted: Here are the links (although the video did not transfer with theRead More onslaught of Patch 2.0: http://ranchosantamargarita.patch.com/groups/volunteering/p/on-flag-day-they-go-out-in-a-blaze-of-old-glory and here is the other: http://ranchosantamargarita.patch.com/groups/summer/p/flags-retired-in-a-blaze-of-old-glory
Richard Oakley June 10, 2013 at 07:40 am
My wife Gail and I were honored to volunteer at Ranchofest with fine young Marines from the 2/5 atRead More Camp Pendleton. America is in good hands with these young soldiers!! Hoo rah!!
InformedParent June 11, 2013 at 01:05 pm
Ranchofest was fun. I did find it to be a bit too expensive, however. I'm not sure I'll go nextRead More year.