.
Feedback

Moms Talk: Schools Ban Charlie Brown, Santa and Poinsettias

First, schools banned Halloween. Now a class outing to see a church performance of "A Charlie Brown Christmas" could be nixed as well. Have schools taken things too far when it comes to 'anti-Christmas' activities?

RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA, CA -- “A Charlie Brown Christmas” has been a holiday TV classic for years. So when students at Terry Elementary School in Little Rock, Ark., were invited on a class field trip to see a performance of the show this December, they were excited. But their excitement was quickly quenched when a parent complained; an atheist group got wind of the outing and called it a “violation of religious freedom” because it contains some religious content and will be performed at a church.

The school sent a letter home to the parents detailing the field trip and letting them know that it did, indeed, contain a small amount of religious content but that any child who wished not to go could be exempt from attending. The outing also included a food drive for area food pantries, which parents hope students will not miss out on if the outing is cancelled.

Schools around the nation have dealt with similar anti-Christmas sentiments. In Alabama, a group of 5- to 7- year -olds were asked not to sing “Silent Night” in their Christmas program because it was considered “unconstitutional.” The school overrode the complaint and students will be allowed to perform as planned. But in Davis, Cal., students at Emerson Junior High encountered a different outcome when the play they planned to perform, Charles Dickens’ “ A Christmas Carol,” was banned because of—you guessed it—the word “Christmas.”

The list goes on. In Stockton, the school district warned teachers not to put up any poinsettias, Christmas trees or other decorations that would be considered festive, just to make sure they did not offend anyone. And in Fort Worth, Texas, Santa was banned from classrooms because his visit was considered “endorsing religious activity.” The ban was later overturned and the schools agreed Santa could come to the schools but not enter the classrooms.

Contrast these times with the 1950s, when many kids performed in nativity plays at school, complete with Mary, Joseph and baby Jesus in the manger. Now, in places like Santa Monica, the mere sight of a nativity scene on public property is reason for outcry. In an age of “over-political correctness” have schools and cities taken things too far and taken the fun and meaning out of a holiday that’s been celebrated worldwide for years and years?

“We still talk about Kwanza, Hanukkah, Ramadan and the pagan celebration of winter solstice,” one blogger mom wrote. “I have no problem with exposing my children to those cultural holidays, but in fairness, shouldn’t we be able to discuss the origins of Christmas as well?”

Surprisingly, a Rasmussen Reports national television survey showed that 68 percent of most Americans still preferred the traditional greeting, “Merry Christmas” during the season. Yet most store employees and school teachers have been required to now use the less offensive “Happy Holidays” approach. A Christmas break is no longer called such at most schools; it is referred to as a holiday or winter break, merely due to the religious implications of the word. So are we really so offended after all?

I believe in God and celebrate Christmas with my family, yet I respect others’ views as well. However, I have yet to meet one person in my entire life who was offended by a poinsettia, a nativity scene, a Christmas cookie or—Heaven forbid—Santa Claus himself! For some reason, I can’t picture a 6-year-old child growing horrified upon seeing a wreath on his teacher’s door.  It seems a shame that we’ve taken not just the “Christmas” but the “Merry” out of so much of this special holiday season because of a few Grinches who insist on spoiling the fun for the kids.

Interestingly, no one seemed too “offended” when Black Friday shopping this year, as they piled their carts high with bargain brand named clothes, electronics and must-have toys. And no one yet has complained about the fact that Christmas is a Federal Holiday for all employees. Perhaps if we were being truly politically correct we should re-open the post office and send kids to school on December 25.

I’m being facetious, of course.

Parents, what do you think? Do you think schools should celebrate Christmas in the classrooms? And what of the schools that have banned certain plays, songs, decorations and activities? Do you think they’ve taken things too far, or do you think they’ve done the right thing?

We want to hear from you!

met00 December 5, 2012 at 12:49 am
Hey, Big Lou... The Muslim's know where you live...
Panglonymous December 5, 2012 at 01:08 am
Yeah. I guess as a pro you get kinda jaded to it all.
Julie Mortenson December 5, 2012 at 02:04 am
met00 You are completely out of line. First of all you do not own the US. I am not lying about the United States. Apparently, you wish for the history to mirror your beliefs. We all live here and we have the right to religious freedom as long as we separate church and state. However, that definition is being totally abused due to disrespect from many different areas. You have no right to make any demands from me. You don't know me. The Mayflower came over carrying people seeking religious freedom and yes they were Christians. Most of our forefather's were Christians and a few atheists. We are no longer a Christian nation because there are believers of other faiths that live here. So where have I made anything up? I can't change history. Does the truth hurt that much? Many more people used to believe in God than they do now. There are issues that are far more important than what you are concerned with. What has happened in your lifetime to cause so much hatred coming from your direction? You have made so many assumptions about someone you have never met. May someone have mercy on your soul. If this is what lack of faith causes I'm definitely, on the right track.
Julie Mortenson December 5, 2012 at 02:15 am
"I'd rather have faith in God than think that we were all created by an explosion."
"Why? The latter has evidence, that can be independently verified to parts in trillion. The former, well, what evidence do you have that Lord Ganesha was really created from a slain boy and an elephant's head by Lord Shiva?" What? I have no clue as to who Lord Ganesha is. You must be thinking of someone else. Remember, the big bang theory is a theory. THEORIES are theories. Explosions cause chaos not order. Man and the earth and surroundings are far too complex to be created out of chaos. The creation of DNA alone is very complex. "Please be respectful and acknowledge Lord Ganesha as the one who removes obstacles in people's lives." Respectful of what? I am a Christian the remover of my obstacles is my faith in God. Are you asking me to convert to another faith? Or are you being sarcastic?
Julie Mortenson December 5, 2012 at 02:18 am
What does this article have anything to do with Obama and since when are we supposed to vote for someone according to our faith?
met00 December 5, 2012 at 02:30 am
Actually I DO own the US. I "own" 1 vote. The same as you if you are a citizen. The idiots we elect actually work for us, the owners.
Not that you are making much sense, but where the heck did you ever get the impression that I don't believe in your right to worship / practice your faith / live you mythology as you so choose (as long as (1) It doesn't hurt others and (2) is not supported in any way by the secular state?)? WE NEVER WERE A CHRISTIAN NATION! I can excuse you reading into my words what you want, but I will not excuse ignorance of history. You can choose to be ignorant of history. You can choose to believe a myth that at some point the United States was a Christian nation. But MOST of the founding fathers of this country were in office and voted for the Treaty of Tripoli (and one signed it as President). So, please be as ignorant of the history of the country as you want, but don't get upset when someone corrects your ignorance. You ascribe to me a feeling for you that is not correct. "so much hatred coming from your direction" - Hatred would require as much passion for the people it is aimed at as love does.I don't hate ignorant people. I do pity them. Because I have some small amount of empathy, I attempt to actually teach them the facts from the fiction (not about their embrace of their chosen mythology, that's their business. I worry that they may actually pollute young minds with misinformation, like "the United States is/was a Christian nation".).
Big Lou December 5, 2012 at 01:51 pm
So what!
Julie Mortenson December 5, 2012 at 02:38 pm
met00 Ok, then share with me your intelligence. What other faiths were present when the Pilgrims came over on the Mayflower? When did other faiths come to the US? The majority of the people who settled the United States in the beginning were Christian. How many signers of the Declaration of Independence were NOT Christian. Your understanding of American history appears to be very different than most of us and that does scare me. You have a great fear and a huge amount of disrespect for anyone else that does not share your belief. No, you do not own the US. Stop trying to prove it. All American tax payers and voters have a part of the US. Why are you so angry?
Julie Mortenson December 5, 2012 at 02:45 pm
Met00 I have read the Tripoli Treaty and it was between the US and a Muslim nation. However, if you have done your homework,The treaty of Tripoli remained on the books for eight years, at which time the treaty was renegotiated, and Article 11 was dropped. Article 11 states "As the Government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the law, religion or tranquility of Musselmen; and as the states never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mohometan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinion shall ever produce an interruption of harmony existing between the two countries." So it appears the people who signed it didn't understand to what extent they were signing and it was renegotiated. So it doesn't appear that the Treaty of Tripoli has much leverage anymore if that part of it was removed. You will need to find some more information to back up your claim. Be nice. Nice is good.
Shripathi Kamath December 5, 2012 at 03:49 pm
"The treaty of Tripoli remained on the books for eight years, at which time the treaty was renegotiated, and Article 11 was dropped"
Does not matter. The fact that the treaty was approved by a body that consisted of founders does not change what they said about Christianity in there. The treaty was not made to establish non-Christian nature of the nation at birth, it was to prevent hostilities. The note about the non-Christian nature was just that, an observation. When a treaty is violated, it does not change observations. Try again. Try harder.
Shripathi Kamath December 5, 2012 at 03:53 pm
"What? I have no clue as to who Lord Ganesha is. You must be thinking of someone else. Remember, the big bang theory is a theory. THEORIES are theories. "
Yes, apples are apples. APPLES are apples. THEORIES are theories. Any more tautologies? "Man and the earth and surroundings are far too complex to be created out of chaos. The creation of DNA alone is very complex." Please provide evidence, your personal incredulity is not even a theory. Peddling creationism does not serve as a substitute. "Respectful of what?" Respectful of Lord Ganesha.
Big Lou December 5, 2012 at 06:13 pm
Julie,you're wasting your time,you can't reach these people,and I use the word people very loosely, Met00 is just an arrogant, bitter man with no life,if he has children,I pity them,I actually feel sorry for him for being so narrow minded. And if any Muslims have a problem with me,we'll that's their problem, they are the ones violating the Treaty of Tripoli which is basically a joke. So Met00 and everyone else who feels Christmas should not exist, KISS OFF, there are more of Us than of you,and I mean the people who like to celebrate Christmas for what it is,Jesus' Birthday,you don't want your tax dollars spent on it,not a problem,We'll just use your tax dollars on St.Patricks day.
met00 December 5, 2012 at 07:44 pm
http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/tserve/eighteen/ekeyinfo/natrel.htm
Yes, Julie dear, there were people already living here and they had mythologies that they believed in. Then the people that came here were people that were leaving from places where they could not worship as they chose. Yet, colonial church membership was relatively low--rarely higher than a third of adult New Englanders and as low as five percent of adults in the South. You may have heard of these deists: Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Cornelius Harnett, Gouverneur Morris, Hugh Williamson, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Ethan Allen and Thomas Paine. Also Elihu Palmer If you don't understand why Deism is NOT Christianity, study. Jefferson was so upset with Christianity that he rewrote the bible. One would hope that you would understand that people that were used to having the government persecute them for their religious beliefs would want to establish a place where the government has NOTHING to do with endorsing any religious belief system. Even as simple an endorsement of monotheism would be abhorrent to people that had to flee from government oppression because they had a different belief system from the "will of the majority" that the government endorsed. If you actually took the time to study rather than "quickie research", you would understand a great deal more about the history of this country.
met00 December 5, 2012 at 08:02 pm
"So it appears the people who signed it didn't understand to what extent they were signing and it was renegotiated."
Yep, a bunch of illiterates, most of whom signed the DoI, the Constitution or were deeply involved in getting their state to agree to the Constitution, signed a treaty that was years in the making without reading or understanding what was involved in the treaty. That's your best defense. That the founding fathers of this nation were a bunch of idiots?
MFriedrich December 5, 2012 at 08:32 pm
Maybe there wouldn't be a problem if they just hummed the songs instead?
Charlie Brown gets depressed and psychotic after getting shamelessly bullied by a bunch of girls, who laugh and say that he's a "blockhead" and "can't do anything right". Even CB's own dog laughs at him. Anyway, then his best friend Linus gets preachy and tells the distraught Charlie Brown about the true meaning of Christmas. Yes, Linus gets it completely wrong by quoting the Gospel of Luke and totally leaving out Saturnalia, but whatever. Charles M. Schulz was an artist and entertainer, not a historian. But do ideals like vicarious redemption, scapegoating and blood sacrifice belong in the public schools? I say yes. So long as they just hum it.
Julie Mortenson December 5, 2012 at 08:39 pm
met00 I no longer have the time to argue with you. You don't really know who attended church or who didn't unless you had attendance records for all of the churches back then. But it was more frequent than today as Church for one was a place to socialize. It served many purposes compared today.
So I'm done with this conversation. You want to rationalize it to death because you've read some books. Faith is not this way. You have your beliefs. Personally, I don't care who is Christian or not. I am not out to convert atheists because personally they, like you, suck the life out of me. I can't afford that. I have far more responsibilities that are more worthwhile. I know what my beliefs are and I find it to be foolish to not allow children to watch a Charlie Brown Christmas play. You have blown this whole thing out of proportion because you live your life to fight with Christians. I live my life to serve Christians and people of my church. It is far less complicated. You can't research faith to death. Either you have it or you don't. You don't. I wish you well. I have a congregation to serve and you can read into that any way you wish.
Panglonymous December 5, 2012 at 09:28 pm
Savant learns how to speak Icelandic in a week
- Charlie: I guess you were right Linus; I shouldn't have picked this little tree. Everything I do turns into a disaster. I guess I don't really know what Christmas is about. Isn't there anyone who understands what Christmas is all about? Linus: Sure, I can tell you what Christmas is all about. Linus goes to center stage, spotlight. Linus: "And there were in the same country Shepards abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night. And lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them, and they were sore afraid. And the angel said unto them, 'fear not, for behold, I bring you tidings of great joy which will be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a savior, which is Christ the Lord. And this shall be a sign unto you. Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes lying in the manger.' And suddenly, there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host, praising God and saying, 'glory to God in the highest, and on Earth peace, good will toward men.'" Linus picks up blanket, walks back to piano. Linus: That's what Christmas is all about, Charlie Brown. Silence. Charlie picks up tree, smiles. Walks outside, stares at sky. - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPHv9KqpgqM
Shripathi Kamath December 5, 2012 at 09:55 pm
Well let's go back to the beginning. The article starts off with
"First, schools banned Halloween." So, we know what was first. First meaning before anything else. Before this so-called war on Christmas which has now spilled over into Thanksgiving with the rush for shopping for Christmas. Schools banning Halloween. Now, why would schools ban Halloween? Well it was Los Gatos, that liberal bastion of godlessness that banned a pagan ritual. Does that sound right to you? That godless, anti-Christian liberals would ban a pagan ritual and not Christmas? Here: http://bit.ly/SHjQgN
Panglonymous December 5, 2012 at 10:26 pm
I respectfully acknowledge Lord Ganesha as the one who removes obstacles in people's lives. :-)
met00 December 6, 2012 at 12:37 am
"You don't really know who attended church or who didn't unless you had attendance records for all of the churches back then."
Hmmm, let's see the reference work... study of diaries, missionary reports sent back to England, and other fragmentary evidence... I wasn't there, but I can do some basic research and see the works of other researchers who have gone through various pieces of evidence of those that were. "You have blown this whole thing out of proportion because you live your life to fight with Christians" Amazing. I thought I lived my life to provide for my family. You seem to know everything about me from my postings on here. You think I'm anti-Christian. That's because that's all you see. You see everything through the lens of your BLIND faith. It's hard to see through anything "blind". Forgetting my personal belief system as it is none of your business (and you have no idea what "faith" I may or may not have), I am a vocal critic of those that think their faith is the ultimate truth and insist on practicing it in public, and wanting the endorsement of the government (either explicitly or implicitly). While you serve a "congregation", I'll continue to serve mankind. Even those who are mistakenly under the impression that they have the ultimate Truth, like yourself. I will ensure your freedom by making sure that NO "faith" has any government support. In a secular society you too are protected.
Stephanie December 10, 2012 at 12:07 am
As a Music educator, parent, and taxpayer, I have to say I disagree. Teachers obviously came up with the idea, so they must have thought it adds to the students' educational goals.Taxpayers usually DO NOT pay for extracurricular activities such as field trips anyway.... parents either pay, or they are funded through fundraisers or organizations such as PTA/PTO (who is funded through fundraisers). So sorry to burst your bubble, but your hard earned tax dollars aren't contributing to field trips. Even if they were, it's not as if you willingly give your tax dollars towards education, they are mandated to be taken. You probably don't agree with your tax dollars paying for me to teach such an "extracurricular" subject, but that's a discussion for another time. It's because of people like you that my field is decreasing in size despite its importance. Merry Christmas.
Stephanie December 10, 2012 at 12:12 am
If the parents were okay, then why is this even an issue? No one even mentioned that this was a school-funded trip. I'm a Music educator, and none of the trips for anyone at my school are school-funded. For example, the Kindergarten classes at one of the schools I teach at have been selling chocolate bars to fund a trip to the zoo. I don't understand why some people automatically assume that the school paid for this (not that this would be a problem in my eyes, as long as nothing else was lacking because of it). Maybe the parents themselves paid for it...
Julie Mortenson December 10, 2012 at 02:49 pm
met00 I don't know you at all except that I feel your intense desire to put down other people for their faith. You seem to want to compare your research with others and if we don't know as much as you do you let us know. You also seem to think you know me as well. I serve my congregation and mankind as well. It is impossible for me to separate the two. You have no intention of being friendly with people like myself. You only want to make us look bad. You are tied up to what your tax dollar spends and making others look bad to make yourself feel better. Don't judge until you've walked a mile in their shoes. If you do serve mankind when was the last time you helped someone who really needed help? Do you give shoes to the shoeless? Do you feed those without food? Do you clothe people? That is what truly helping mankind is about. It also happens to be a basic Christian belief.
met00 December 10, 2012 at 03:31 pm
" I don't know you at all except that I feel your intense desire to put down other people for their faith"
I would prefer to NOT know a darn thing about your personal faith. That's why they call it "personal". I would rather everyone kept it that way. You tell me about it, I get to make fun of and ridicule it. And I will. "You are tied up to what your tax dollar spends and making others look bad to make yourself feel better." Correct until your "and". I don't want my tax dollars going to useless wars. I don't want my tax dollars spent on promoting mythology. I do want my tax dollars going to research, education, the well being of the country and the public good. " If you do serve mankind when was the last time you helped someone who really needed help?" Define "really needed help". I help people all the time. From the kids I coach in football to the students I coach and the organizations I write free software for. My daughter graduates this year with over 1000 hours of community service (less than .5% of HS grads) she had to learn that somewhere. My son just started tutoring others for free (age 12) in math (he is getting A's in geometry in 7th grade). "It also happens to be a basic Christian belief." Yes, I know, they helped so much during the Crusades. And let us not forget how helpful they were during the Inquisition. Considering how much death can be placed on the tip of the sword with Jesus' name, I find that conclusion highly laughable.
Rick Hill December 11, 2012 at 12:25 am
Wow, just wow. I mean I knew that others had different belief systems than me and I am by no means a stranger to the ways of the world, but wow. I have been in the army for more years than I care to think of as well as been working in corrections long enough to say that I have been in prison longer than most of my inmates, on top of that I have been to at least three foreign countries and I have seen this beautiful country from Honolulu to St. Croix and in all that I have learned that the only thing worse than racial bigotry and intolerance is religious ignorance and small-mindedness. Religious ignorance is just as bad as religious fanaticism. Religion is hard wired into the psychology of the human race and it will never go away. There are still people who pray to Jupiter and Odin. Intentional ridicule of another’s religion is not only just plain rude but, on a larger scale, that’s how wars are started. Speaking of which, if the only knowledge a person has of Christianity begins and ends with such things as the Crusades and the Inquisition than your education is seriously lacking. It is basically the same as claiming to know higher mathematics but not realizing that higher math comes with comes with letters and zeros. At the heart of Christianity is peace, love and forgiveness. If you don’t believe that, well, you are welcome to your beliefs and I am enough of a grown mature adult with enough manners not to ridicule anyone for it.
Rick Hill December 11, 2012 at 12:26 am
sounds like someone woke up on the wrong side of creation.
Shripathi Kamath December 11, 2012 at 03:10 am
"Speaking of which, if the only knowledge a person has of Christianity begins and ends with such things as the Crusades and the Inquisition than your education is seriously lacking."
Yes, and if there are Christians who believe that the mention of just those things in comments limited to 1,500 characters, to a post, represents the entirely of the author's knowledge, then, someone else's knowledge is likewise seriously lacking. "It is basically the same as claiming to know higher mathematics but not realizing that higher math comes with comes with letters and zeros." No, it is nothing like that straw man "At the heart of Christianity is peace, love and forgiveness." Someday, we may even find that heart. Till then we can go with how Christians behave. Witness their comments here. "Muslims will never become a majority religion,we will wipe them out first." "Well, looks like someone whizzed in Chuckies Cheerios this morning." "Another intelligent idiot!!" "YOU PROBABLY DONT HAVE ANY KIDS. OR YOY WERE ABUSED AS A CHILD>" "You are full of C$$$ What's wrong with you nutty politically correct idiots??" "ARE YOU SUGGESTING THAT THEY BE EXPOSED TO THE MUSLIM SECT?" "I love how you libs are out to destroy religion in all forms." "Dude you are such an Idiot." "You should check on leaving the US just as soon as possible . Your a Heartless Individual." It just oozes, doesn't it? I know, I know, they may not be true Christians.
met00 December 11, 2012 at 04:08 am
I could let Shri handle this and just ignore the post, but as good as his answer is, I won't.
"you are welcome to your beliefs and I am enough of a grown mature adult with enough manners not to ridicule anyone for it." That's because you don't have any idea what I believe. Because I keep my "personal faith" - well - "personal". I may teach it to my kids. I may share it with others in my place of worship. I may, on occasion share some part of it with someone over a nice cigar while we talk about life and our personal philosophy. But I don't promote the crap out of it. I prefer to be judged by others based on my actions, not on the mythology I profess to be a "Truth" to me. Throughout this thread I have made clear that I respect a persons "personal faith". If you get to that place rubbing green mud in your navel. great for you. If you find solace in times of trouble by getting inner strength from your mythology, more power to you. But do NOT expect the State to endorse, either explicitly or implicitly, your myths. And do expect others to object to state endorsement, as well as objecting to any suggestion that this melting pot of a country is anything but secular. If someone can't accept that this is a secular society because the founders saw the failure of nations that in any way endorse one faith system over any other, then they deserve to be put in their place. One last time, "personal faith" = good and "public faith" = bad.
met00 December 11, 2012 at 04:21 am
"especially if a well rounded curriculum would include at least a some education in the various forms of Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism and / or any of the other major religions of the world."
Rick, if we had that, and I do support high school electives on comparative mythology, I would be overjoyed. Maybe then we would be able to dissuade people of the fantasy that Buddhism is a religion (it's not. It is a life philosophy, but it doesn't have in it the concept of worship or of G-d and therefor is not a religion). For instance, every "religion" has a series of tale on "how we got here". These creation myths are all different, but all attempt to address how and why man is on the earth. A great deal about a society can be found by study of these myths. Are the myths matriarchal or patriarchal? Do the include a myth about the god(s) creation as well as mans? How does this reflect the structure of the society at the time? Are their god(s) reflective of the society and the rules of the society at that time, or are they different? What powers have the endued the god(s) with? Is there one god, a figure head, and then lesser god(s)? These courses look at everything from ancient mythologies to current ones. But it seems that the people that object the loudest to these courses being taught are.... wait for it.... religious Christians. Me? I'm all for it. Now get an evangelical to agree. May Darwin keep and protect you at the fountain of knowledge.
Mariko Buntaro December 18, 2012 at 07:54 pm
BTW, the state sponsers a lot of other faiths and non-faiths and groups. Why not christian based things? Or even just the santa claus bit? Where's the harm in making it equal?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Rancho Santa Margarita Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Julie, Brady, and Brad McGirr Participating in the Flag Retiring Ceremony
Cheri Miller June 16, 2013 at 12:16 pm
This was our third year. I especially like being involved in the folding of the flags to beRead More retired. My daughter & I have always been the only ones from her troop to attend. Last year there were more Girl Scouts. I really wish the word was put out there more for them as well as the Boys.
Martin Henderson (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 01:43 am
For those interested, here (with pictures and video) are past reports of Flag Day.
Martin Henderson (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 01:45 am
Oops, I hit return before I wanted: Here are the links (although the video did not transfer with theRead More onslaught of Patch 2.0: http://ranchosantamargarita.patch.com/groups/volunteering/p/on-flag-day-they-go-out-in-a-blaze-of-old-glory and here is the other: http://ranchosantamargarita.patch.com/groups/summer/p/flags-retired-in-a-blaze-of-old-glory
Richard Oakley June 10, 2013 at 07:40 am
My wife Gail and I were honored to volunteer at Ranchofest with fine young Marines from the 2/5 atRead More Camp Pendleton. America is in good hands with these young soldiers!! Hoo rah!!
InformedParent June 11, 2013 at 01:05 pm
Ranchofest was fun. I did find it to be a bit too expensive, however. I'm not sure I'll go nextRead More year.